Riverbed date palm: species, variety or myth?
In 1997, botanists from the University of Murcia described a new species, Phoenix iberica , an “Iberian species, which closely resembles the date palm, although its fruits are of smaller size and quality”. They acknowledge natural populations in the river basin of the Chícamo River, in the Abanilla Desert (Murcia), today a protected River Nature Reserve. Since its description, this palm has been highly controversial both among palm lovers and within the scientific community. Although it is true that the main taxonomic institutions still do not recognize P iberica as a species or as a variety [2,3], it is also true that molecular studies are capable of detecting the genetic exceptionality of Murcian populations of wild date palms . Two main hypotheses coexist today, the “rewilded” hypothesis and the “vicariant” hypothesis. But before getting into the matter, let’s put the topic in context.
The date palms in context
The genus Phoenix includes 14 species, generally known as date palms, distributed throughout southern Europe, Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and South Asia. One of them, P dactylifera, or the date palm in the strict sense, is a species that is widespread in cultivation in North Africa, the Mediterranean basin, and the Middle East, but for which no natural populations are currently recognized [5,6]. There are hundreds of man-made varieties of P dactylifera, such as the “Mejdool” or “Barhee” varieties, which are cultivated in order to produce dates. P dactylifera is one of the oldest known domestic plants, as humans started planting and selecting variants in Mesopotamia more than 5,000 years ago . Its cultivation quickly spread throughout North Africa, being brought to the south of Spain by the Phoenicians before the invasion of Hispania by the Romans .
P caespitosa, P sylvestris, and the island Phoenixes, canariensis, atlantica, and theophrasti, all overlap geographically with P dactylifera. Outside the region dominated by P dactylifera crops, other Phoenixes exist. On the one hand, the Senegal date palm, P reclinata, is widely spread throughout sub-Saharan Africa. On the other hand, there are a few date palms in Southeast Asia. Officially, P iberica is considered a variant of cultivated P dactylifera, widely expanded during ancient times.
The “rewilded” hypothesis
It is not surprising that the international scientific community does not accept P iberica when the Spanish authorities themselves do not recognize its status as a taxon. Volume 18 of Flora Iberica, the botanical reference manual of the plant species of the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands, published by the Royal Botanical Garden of Madrid, refers to this palm within the section dedicated to P dactylifera, indicating that such palm “could belong to naturalized specimens of P dactylifera” . According to this theory, the Phoenicians brought to the Iberian Peninsula, where no plant of the Phoenix genus existed before, specimens of date palm trees for their agricultural plantation. Over the centuries, feral populations have developed from seeds which escaped from crops, having evolved slightly in the new natural conditions they encountered in the Chícamo River and the southern Spanish deserts. This hypothesis, therefore, does not grant a relevant intrinsic value to the rivebed palm tree.
The “vicariant” hypothesis
the riverbed date palm, P iberica, is the only palm that is endemic to continental Europe, and one of the few known European palms. Some hypothesize that it is a cultivated date palm that has escaped and become feral in the river basins of the deserts of the Spanish Levant. Although it does not yet have taxonomic recognition, molecular studies indicate that it may be a distinct species. The hypothesis according to which it is a vicariant species, reminiscent of the distribution of original fruiting date palms before the spread of domesticated varieties, is gaining strength.
 Rivera Nuñez, D., Obón de Castro, C., Ríos Ruiz, S., Selma Ferrández, C., Méndez Colmenero, F., Verde López, A., y Cano Trigueros, F., (1997). Las variedades tradicionales de frutales de la cuenca del río Segura. Catálogo Entnobotánico (1): Frutos secos, Oleaginosos, Frutales de Hueso, Almendros y Frutales de Pepita, páginas 72-76. Universidad de Murcia.
 APG IV en Global Biodiversity Information Facility https://www.gbif.org/ accessed March 2022
 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Wolrd Checklist of Selected Plant Families (WCSP) https://wcsp.science.kew.org/ accessed March 2022
 Gros-Balthazard, M., Michel Hazzouri, K., y Mark Flowers J (2018). Genomic Insights into Date Palm Origins. Genes, 9, 502; doi:10.3390/genes9100502
 Gros-Balthazard, M., Baker, W.J., Leitch, I.J., Pellicer, J., Powell, R.F., Bellot, S. (2021). Systematics and Evolution of the Genus Phoenix: Towards Understanding Date Palm Origins. In: Al-Khayri, J.M., Jain, S.M., Johnson, D.V. (eds) The Date Palm Genome, Vol. 1. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73746-7_2
 Gros-Balthazard M, Newton C, Ivorra S, Pierre M-H, Pintaud J-C, Terral J-F (2016) The Domestication Syndrome in Phoenix dactylifera Seeds: Toward the Identification of Wild Date Palm Populations. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0152394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152394
 Chao C. T. y Krueger R. R. (2007). The Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.): Overview of Biology, Uses, and Cultivation. American Society for Horticultural Sciences 42(5) doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.42.5.1077
 Rivera, D., Obón, C., Alcaraz, F., Laguna, E., y Johnson, D.
(2018). Date-palm (Phoenix, Arecaceae) iconography in coins from the Mediterranean and West Asia (485 BC–1189 AD). Journal of Cultural Heritage, 37 doi:10.1016/j.culher.2018.10.010
 Castroviejo, S. et al. (eds.) (2008). Flora Iberica 18: 1-420. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid
 Rivera, D., Obón de Castro, C., Carreño, E. , Inocencio C., Alcaraz, F., Ríos, S., Palazón, J.A., Vázquez, L., y Laguna, E. (2008). Morphological Systematics of Date-Palm Diversity (Phoenix, Arecaceae) in Western Europe and Some Preliminary Molecular Results. Acta Horticulturae, 799. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.799.11